Survey of North Carolina and Fourth Circuit Law
The North Carolina Law Review’s annual Survey of North Carolina and Fourth Circuit Law embodies its commitment to support the practicing attorneys, lawmakers, and judges of North Carolina. By devoting an entire issue to North Carolina legal topics each year, the Review provides a unique service to its readers and advances the larger mission of the School of Law as a public institution. Its annual Survey seeks to combine academic scholarship with practical experience in a format that few other legal journals attempt. The Survey is a tradition of which the Board of Editors is very proud. The Survey contains scholarship authored by students, academics, and practitioners on relevant North Carolina topics. The North Carolina Survey issue is published annually as the Review’s sixth issue.
Author Submissions
We welcome drafts of articles, detailed abstracts, and research proposals on topics in any subject area directly impacting the North Carolina legal community. We currently are accepting submissions on a rolling basis for the volume 91 North Carolina Survey issue and expect to make all publication decisions by the end of August 2012. Please email submissions or questions to ncissue@unc.edu.
Suggest a Topic
Because the Review seeks to develop current content that impacts the North Carolina legal community, it welcomes members of the state bar to suggest topics on which the Review’s staff members may write. If you would like to suggest a topic for inclusion in the Review’s Survey, please send an email to ncissue@unc.edu with your suggestion. The best topics are those that specifically describe a legal issue and its importance to the North Carolina legal community.
Upcoming Articles: September 2012
The Volume 90 edition of the Survey of North Carolina and Fourth Circuit Law has been finalized. The following is a list of articles that will be published in the September 2012 North Carolina Survey issue of the North Carolina Law Review.
- Thomas Lee Hazen & Lisa Love Hazen, Duties of Nonprofit Corporate Directors – Emphasizing Oversight Responsibilities, 90 N.C. L. Rev. (forthcoming Sept. 2012).
- Brian J. Litwak, Recent Development, Diligence and Digiovanni: The Fourth Circuit’s Interpretation of Investigatory Traffic Stop Reasonableness after Arizona v. Johnson, 90 N.C. L. Rev. (forthcoming Sept. 2012).
- Lisa Lukasik, Deconstructing a Decade of Charter School Funding Litigation: An Argument for Reform, 90 N.C. L. Rev. (forthcoming Sept. 2012).
- Jon McClanahan & Kim Burke, Sharpening the Blunt Blue Pencil: Renewing the Reason for Restrictive Covenants in North Carolina, 90 N.C. L. Rev. (forthcoming Sept. 2012).
- Lance McMillian, Adultery as Tort, 90 N.C. L. Rev. (forthcoming Sept. 2012).
- Matthew W. Sawchak & Kip D. Nelson, Defining Unfairness in “Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices,” 90 N.C. L. Rev. (forthcoming Sept. 2012).
- Asher P. Spiller, Recent Development, The Folly in Finality: The Constitutionality of ALJ Final Decision-Making Authority in North Carolina, 90 N.C. L. Rev. (forthcoming Sept. 2012).
- Dru Stevenson, Judicial Deference to Legislatures in Constitutional Analysis, 90 N.C. L. Rev. (forthcoming Sept. 2012).